Charles Holster

Since 1984, I have had the honor of representing clients in civil and criminal appeals, and complex litigation. During that time, I have continually been learning from my colleagues, and also contributing to the advancement of the law by lecturing and authoring articles on appellate practice and other legal topics. A commitment to excellence is the driving force behind my approach to each and every case.

Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University

J.D. | Law

1979 - 1982

Hofstra University

MBA (1982) | Finance

1979 - 1982

State University of New York - Stony Brook

B.A. | Economics

1977 - 1979

Activities: Debate Society

Owner

Law Offices of CHARLES E. HOLSTER III, ESQ.

1984 - Current

For 39 years, I have been representing clients in civil and criminal appeals, and complex litigation.

The Windows of Opportunity for Reargument Motions

Family Law Review (New York State Bar Association, Family Law Section)

2023

"What Constitutes Probable Cause for a `Real-time' CSLI Warrant?"

Nassau Lawyer

March, 2022

"Real-time Cell-Site Location Information: Where Are We Going?"

Nassau Lawyer

January, 2022

"The Government Must Now Obtain A Warrant To Compel Disclosure of Cell Phone Location Records"

LLRX

October, 2018

“Jury Instructions as Grounds for Appeal”

Nassau Lawyer

March, 2014

"Family Court Appeals", Nassau County Bar Association

April 21, 2008

Nassau Academy of Law

“Evaluation of Professional Licenses and Practices”, Nassau County Bar Association

Nassau Academy of Law

Appeals Panel, Assigned Counsel Defender Plan

Appellate Division, Second Department, 1986 -

Nassau County Bar Association  # 14045

Member

1984 - Current

Activities: Appellate Practice Committee; Publications Committee; Criminal Law and Procedure Committee; Matrimonial Law Committee

New York

Since 2004

2nd Circuit

Since 2005

U.S. Court of International Trade

Since 1986

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York

Since 1986

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Since 1986

U.S. Supreme Court

Since 2006

• Free Consultation
  An initial consultation generally lasts between 30 to 60 minutes. It is an opportunity you to provide an overview of the problem about which you are seeking legal assistance, or the ongoing court case concerning which you are seeking a second opinion. It will allow me to ascertain what the case is about, what your objectives are, what may need to be done to reach those objectives. It is not enough time in which to convey to an attorney all of the information that he would need to arrive at a final informed opinion. It is merely a starting point.
• Credit Cards Accepted
• Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
  Appeals: My fee for an appeal is an agreed upon, fixed amount, based upon the estimated time that the appeal I expect the appeal to take me to complete. I also estimate the out of pocket expenses that may be required, and an amount sufficient to cover those expenses must be paid in advance. Complex Litigation: An hourly rate is charged for ongoing litigation, since it is not possible to know how long an active case will continue.

• Civil Appeals
• Criminal Appeals
• Complex Litigation
• Administrative Law

Q. Can I pursue a civil lawsuit for damages related to a successful 440.20 motion not honored by the court?

March 17, 2025

A: This question cannot possibly be answered unless I review your entire file. I would charge for that by the hour, or I could quote you a flat fee after seeing how big the complete file is when you bring it to my office.

Q. How can I address the court's failure to honor a 440.20 motion and my Sixth Amendment rights in NY?

March 17, 2025

A: In order to answer your question, I would have to review the ENTIRE file for your case, from day one until the present. If you are interested in retaining me for that purpose, please have someone assemble the COMPLETE file and bring it to my office. Once I see how large the file is, I will be able to give you an estimate of how long it will take me to review it, and what my fee would be to review it and then give you my opinion.

Q. Challenge of property division after NY divorce, Puerto Rico ignoring statute of limitations?

March 17, 2025

A: You said you already appealed to the highest court. So, there is nothing more that I could suggest. In any event, I would have to review your entire file, for the U.S. and for Puerto Rico, including your appeal, before I could understand what exactly happened. If you would like to retain me to do that, assemble all of the papers, then call for an appointment.