David John Stanoch

Attorney David J. Stanoch is an associate at Golomb & Honik, P.C., bringing with him extensive experience in complex legal matters involving anti-trust, consumer fraud, and products liability. At the firm, Mr. Stanoch focuses his practice on the representation of mass torts and class action lawsuits. Prior to joining the firm, he clerked for a federal district court judge, the Honorable James F. McClure, Jr. He also worked as an associate at Dechert LLP for almost a decade. While there, he was responsible for advising Fortune 50, 100 and 200 clients on matters pertaining to complex litigation, state and federal government investigations, and various regulatory matters. Mr. Stanoch has also represented clients in many industries—including banking, food and agriculture, healthcare, and pharmaceuticals. Today, he uses this industry knowledge to represent the best interests of his clients. Mr. Stanoch graduated magna cum laude from Temple University School of Law with his Juris Doctorate degree, prior to which he received his undergraduate degree from La Salle University. He is currently licensed to practice law in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and has been admitted to practice before the: • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit • U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania • U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

Temple University Beasley School of Law

J.D. (2003) | Law

2003

LaSalle University

B.A. (2000)

2000

Associate

Golomb & Honik, P.C.

2015 - Current

Associate

Dechert LLP

2005 - 2015

Law Clerk

Federal District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

2003 - 2005

Hiring Practices Can Be An Antitrust Violation?

Corporate Counsel

2012

It’s a Jungle Out There: Animal Science Ruling Highlights Need for Strict Application of Twombly to Claims Subject to FTAIA

BNA Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report

2011

When Reason Prevails: The Sixth and Ninth Circuits’ Recent Applications of the Rule of Reason Over Per Se or Quick Look Analyses

ABA Antitrust Law Section, Joint Conduct Committee E-Bulletin

2011

Initial Recognition of the "Regulatory Defence" by a United States Court in a Pharmaceutical Case

The International Comparative Legal Guide to Pharmaceutical Advertising

2007

Pennsylvania State Bar  # 91342

Member

Current

New Jersey

Since 2003

Pennsylvania

Since 2003

• Credit Cards Accepted
• Contingent Fees

• Class Action