Stephen M Vincent
Attorney at State 48 Law
Stephen Vincent is a founding member and attorney at State 48. Stephen has a passion for the law and teaching. He has combined those loves as the head of new client intake and head of legal education programs. He also is the firm’s main researcher and works on all appellate cases.
Stephen Vincent, Attorney, is a lifelong writer who uses this skill to explain clearly and memorably a client’s case to judges. A native of St. George, Utah, Stephen attended Arizona State University for law school where he interned for the Goldwater Institute and worked as a Justice Court mediator. After law school, Stephen worked for a year at the Washington County (Utah) Attorney’s Office. While there, he drafted county ordinances, assisted in homicide prosecutions, and headed up a major project to protect the county’s access to federal lands.
Before law school, Stephen worked as a sportswriter in Utah. He has also taught writing and communication courses at Southern Utah University and Dixie State University. Because of his background as a professional writer and writing instructor, Stephen is the ideal person to tell your story. Stephen loves sports and spending time with his 24 nieces and nephews.
- Arizona State University
- J.D. (2013) | Law
- -
- Honors: Four-time Pedrick Scholar (Dean's List) CALI Award in Arizona Media Law
-
- Southern Utah University
- M.A. (2008) | Communication
- -
-
- Brigham Young University
- B.A. (2004) | Communications (Print Journalism). Minor: English
- -
-
- Client Intake Attorney and Appellate Attorney
- State 48 Law
- - Current
- Senior Attorney
- Best Law Firm
- -
- Special Deputy County Attorney
- Washington County (Utah) Attorney's Office
- -
- Rising Star
- Super Lawyers
- Top Family Law Lawyers in Scottsdale
- Expertise
- Firm Award
- State Bar of Arizona # 030779
- Member
- Current
-
- Arizona
- State Bar of Arizona
-
- Credit Cards Accepted
- Divorce
- Collaborative Law, Contested Divorce, Military Divorce, Property Division, Same Sex Divorce, Spousal Support & Alimony, Uncontested Divorce
- Family Law
- Adoption, Child Custody, Child Support, Father's Rights, Guardianship & Conservatorship, Paternity, Prenups & Marital Agreements, Restraining Orders, Same Sex Family Law
- Appeals & Appellate
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Family - Arbitration/Mediation
- English
- Q. can i get full custody of my children due to they live in a hostile environment in their dad’s house?
- A: Yes, you can get full custody under those circumstances, but it is far from a guarantee. This is not a clearcut case for getting full custody, but you have arguments you can make that could get you there. A judge is going to be very concerned about what happened with the gymnastics dropoff, but the police likely made a police report about it that you can request. The yelling and screaming is also concerning. (The fact he is having her participate in a sport against her wishes I don't see as being consequential; however, yelling at the child over it is a concern that should be raised).
- Q. Is it possible to petition for a divorce in AZ then work with a mediator to divide property?
- A: Yes, it is possible to do that. A couple things to know:
1. You file and serve your ex with the divorce paperwork. Once you serve your ex, the "marital community" severs (provided you do actually get divorced) on that date, and that mean your joint liability for your spouse's actions end that day as well.
2. Once you file the divorce process is going, so there will be Court deadlines and hearings happening as you try to work out this agreement. You might be to tell the judge you're in mediation and be asked to put on the inactive calendar.
3. He's got to agree to mediation. Then the two of you need to agree on a mediator.
4. There is a collaborative divorce ... Read More
- Q. My Ex attorney filed a motion to strike to my reply to his motion to quash a subpoena.
- A: When someone files a Motion, there are three filings that are permitted:
1. The Motion itself
2. The Response to the Motion
3. The Reply to the Response
You filed a "Reply to Plaintiff’s Reply to Respondent’s Reply to Motion to Quash," so that is a Reply to the Reply (aka a "Sur-Reply"), and that is not permitted absent a Court order allowing you to do so. In that case, opposing counsel was absolutely correct in filing a Motion to Strike.
Another way of looking at it: When you are not the party who requested the motion, you only get one filing: the Response. Above you quoted, "A reply may be filed by the moving party, but any reply must be filed within ... Read More